Thursday, 31 October 2013

Norwich girl awarded £8.1m compensation after she was left with brain damage at her birth

An 11-year-old Norwich girl who has bravely faced disability has been awarded £8.1m compensation after she was left with brain damage at her birth.

Staff at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital failed to pick up on signs that Amber Atkins was in increasing distress when her mother Lyn went into labour in May 2002, resulting in her suffering oxygen starvation in the final few minutes before her birth.

She was left with disabilities needing lifetime care.

Her parents Lyn and Jason welcomed the settlement made at the High Court in London, and said: “It has been a very difficult period for everyone involved, but our hope now is that we can begin to prepare for the future with Amber and live as a family with a degree of certainty and normality.

“Our priority has always been Amber’s care. Her day-to-day needs are significant and will remain so for the rest of her life.

“This settlement, which will result in staged payments each year, will safeguard Amber’s care now and in the future.” The Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Trust will pay Amber, of Brewers Court, a £2.8m lump sum, plus annual index linked payments to pay for the lifetime of care she needs to cope with her disability.

Those payments will start at £125,000 a year, before rising to £208,500 a year when she reaches adulthood.

The court heard that although Amber has retained a bright mind and strong personality, can express herself well and attends mainstream school, she has been left dependent on her parents’ care as the cerebral palsy has affected all four of her limbs and left her wheelchair-bound.

Although she can use a joystick, she writes by using her left hand to operate the keyboard.

Her lawyers argued that, had she been brought into the world just 10 minutes earlier, she would have escaped serious injury.

The hospital admitted liability at an early stage.

Sarah Vaughan-Jones QC, representing the Trust, said: “This is a sad case in which liability was admitted at an early stage and an apology given, which I repeat in open court today.”

Paying tribute to Amber’s parents, she added: “Their devotion is no doubt the reason why she is such a happy little girl.”

Approving the settlement, the judge Mrs Justice Swift praised Lyn and Jason for the way they had looked after Amber and her five-year-old sister Millie.

She said: “I have a clear picture in my mind of Amber and her undoubted personality. I do not underestimate for one minute the hard work and determination of her parents in caring for her.”

She added: “It is no doubt attributeable to their care that Amber is such a happy and fulfilled little girl. Whilst they can in no way compensate Amber for all she has lost, I hope that the damages will provide her and her family with the best possible quality of life in the future.”

A hospital spokesman said: “The High Court has today approved the settlement of a claim brought on behalf of Amber Atkins against the Trust. Amber was delivered at the Trust in May 2002 and sadly suffered injury at birth.

“This claim was investigated in detail by the Trust and an admission of liability was made.

“The Trust has apologised for the circumstances which caused Amber to be injured and is very sorry for the resulting tragic consequences.

“The Trust is pleased the claim has been resolved and that an appropriate compensation package has been agreed.”

This article is courtesy from EDP 24.

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

Mystery object accidentally left inside surgery patient

A foreign object was accidentally left inside a patient during a surgical procedure by the Epsom and St Helier Trust.

The trust would not reveal which hospital the serious event occurred in or what the object was; despite doing so when reporting “never events”, incidents so serious they should never happen, in the past.

However, it is understood this never event occurred under local anaesthetic in one of the maternity departments in May this year. The patient was informed and received an apology.

After an initial review a serious incident investigation was launched which identified a failure of staff to follow trust policy. Following this the chief executive, Matthew Hopkins, apologised to the patient for the failure.

A spokesperson for the Epsom and St Helier Trust said: “We are absolutely committed to providing our patients with a high level of compassionate care, and the health and wellbeing of the people we treat is at the heart of all we do.

“As such, any incident that may impact on the health or safety of our patients – however rare – is taken very seriously indeed.

“In May of this year, we reported one ‘never event’, when a foreign object was retained following a surgical procedure.

“It’s important to note that incidents such as these are rare. In the last financial year, we treated more than 800,000 patients and reported one ‘never event’.

"Whilst we recognise that this is a very small proportion of the total patients treated, we will not hesitate to act upon and learn from these incidents.

“As with any untoward incident, we launched a thorough internal investigation into this matter, and as a priority, actions and measures were put in place to help prevent a similar event occurring.”

This article is courtesy from Your Local Guardian.

Monday, 28 October 2013

NHS patient safety: Barry's story

It was the third anniversary of Barry Harris's death on Wednesday. The 67-year-old former civil engineer, who had gone into the Queen's hospital, Burton, in Staffordshire, to have a knee replacement, died at his home three days after being discharged.

An inquest later heard that he had died from an obstruction in his lower intestine due to recurrent twisting. The coroner recorded a verdict of natural causes.

But the family had felt the hospital, part of the Burton Hospital NHS trust, now under special measures because of the quality and safety of care, had been wrong to let Barry go home with constipation medication when they had not diagnosed what had left him with a distended abdomen and feeling uncomfortable.

The initial operation went well, according to his wife Valerie, 70, but when she first went to pick him up five days after she had taken him in, she was told he had to stay because he had not yet had a bowel movement. By the Monday, a week after Barry had been admitted, he underwent a procedure to see what the problem was. She says staff told her "it looked like a kink in the lower intestine". On the Wednesday, he was sent for a further examination. This time he was allowed to go home. "We waited and were given his discharge notes and constipation powders," said Valerie. "They hadn't really formed any actual conclusions as to what was causing his condition. I was a teacher, he was a civil engineer. We didn't question. You put your trust in professional hands. He wanted to go home so I brought him home."

Two days later, stitches were removed from Barry's leg. "He went up and down the stairs and just thought nature would take its course. On Saturday morning, he got up, had a shower, a small slice of toast, had a cup of tea. But later in the day, he collapsed. He had come into the kitchen, and he had what I thought was a fit. I called the neighbours. They came round and called 999. He was dead within the hour."

A few weeks ago, said Valerie, the trust admitted liability and paid the family a "significant" amount, she said. "But it doesn't replace my husband. I feel quite empty about it."

Laura Ralfe, from lawyers Irwin Mitchell, which represented the family, said: "Barry's care at Burton hospital raised a number of urgent questions. Our investigations found hospital staff missed multiple opportunities to investigate the cause of Barry's bowel problems and ignored obvious symptoms, which we believe, if treated, would in all likelihood have avoided his death."

In another case earlier this month, United Lincolnshire Hospital NHS trust was fined £30,000 and ordered to pay more than £15,000 costs for allowing a radiologist to be exposed to more than double the annual dose limit for skin exposure in just over three months. The radiologist at Pilgrim hospital, Boston, used a CT scanner, but favoured an x-ray method, which meant he stayed in the room rather than leaving, as other consultants did.

The hospital said it had taken measures to correct "this isolated incident", reviewing working practices for all staff working with ionising radiation, and developing checklists for all areas that radiologists work in to provide a more comprehensive training record. No patient was exposed to excess radiation.

This article is courtesy from The Guardian.

Sunday, 27 October 2013

Medical errors earn hospitals money – who knew?

Though I have been accused by various commenters as protecting my own specialty when I point out excesses, flaws and conflicts of interest in the medical profession, this accusation would be handily dismantled after a fair reading of prior posts. Indeed, my own specialty of gastroenterology and my own medical practice has felt the effects of the honed Whistleblower scalpel. If an individual or an institution will not willingly engage in self-criticism, then it creates a credibility gap that may be impossible to bridge. If you want a seat at the table, then arrive exposed and humble.

A study was published in the prestigious medical journal JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association in April 2013 publishing what we have known for decades: hospitals make more money when medical errors are committed. As an aside, I have much more respect for JAMA than I do for the AMA, but I’ll resist the strong temptation to digress.

Here’s how it has worked in the past. If a patient is hospitalized with an inflamed gallbladder and is discharged a day later after surgery, the hospital would be reimbursed according to a specific fee schedule. (Payment systems for hospitalized patients are more complex than this, but accept the above example for the moment.) If this same patient undergoes complications after surgical removal of the gallbladder, the hospital would be paid more. If an infection at the incision site, or the patient develops a reaction to medication that may lead to more testing, then the hospital bill will understandably increase. The issue is if hospitals or physicians should be able to charge more for extra care that was preventable.

There is an inexorable movement away from fee-for-service medicine which antagonists argue lead directly to excessive care. Value based care is the new concept where quality, not quantity, will be measured and reimbursed. There is a growing Never Events list where certain medical complications that are designated as events that should never happen, will never be reimbursed. While this concept sounds attractive in a sound bite, my view on Never Events is more nuanced.

The argument to withhold payment for care that resulted from medical error is potent. Keep in mind that defining a medical error is not as easy as it sounds. One can easily imagine how easy it would be to confuse a medical complication, which is a blameless event, from an error or a negligent act. If I perform a colonoscopy and a perforation develops as a complication, should the hospital and surgeon I consult not be paid for the additional care that would be required?

Would every profession consent to returning fees for mistaken advice or service? Do you agree with the following?
  • Financial advisors should return fees if investment performance is below a designated threshold or differs from their peers.
  • Attorneys who have been found on appeal to have offered ineffective legal arguments at trial, should surrender their fees.
  • A professional baseball player who drops a fly ball should lose a day’s pay.
  • A newspaper publisher should offer a rebate to all readers if a news story is found to be inaccurate owing to a lack of proper editorial oversight.
I realise that medical mistakes cost money, as do some of the hypothetical examples above. I also accept that financial incentives can change behavior and can be an effective tool. But every human endeavor has a finite error rate and we should be cautious before using a financial drone attack against only the medical profession. Let’s use a scalpel here and not a sledge hammer. And those of you outside of medicine, explain why your occupation should be spared from this reform strategy?

If to err is human, and doctors are human, then should we punished for our humanity?

This article is courtesy from MedCity News.

Saturday, 26 October 2013

Changes to first aid regulations come into effect

Businesses now have more flexibility in how they manage their provision of first aid in the workplace following a change in health and safety regulations.

As of today (1 October 2013), the Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981 have been amended, removing the requirement for HSE to approve first aid training and qualifications.

The change is part of HSE’s work to reduce the burden on businesses and put common sense back into health and safety, whilst maintaining standards. The changes relating to first aid apply to businesses of all sizes and from all sectors.

Andy McGrory, HSE’s policy lead for First Aid, said: "HSE no longer approves first-aid training and qualifications. Removing the HSE approval process will give businesses greater flexibility to choose their own training providers and first aid training that is right for their work place, based on their needs assessment and their individual business needs.

"Employers still have a legal duty to make arrangements to ensure their employees receive immediate attention if they are injured or taken ill at work."

Information, including the regulations document and a guidance document to help employers identify and select a competent training provider to deliver any first-aid training indicated by their first-aid needs assessment are available on the HSE website at http://www.hse.gov.uk/firstaid/.

HSE will continue to set the standards for training. While the changes give employers flexibility, the one day Emergency First Aid at Work (EFAW) and three day First Aid at Work (FAW) courses remain the building blocks for first aid training.

As part of the changes, the Approved Code of Practice (ACOP) text which was previously included in guidance document L74 (which consisted of only 12 sentences), has been incorporated into the new guidance. The advice in the guidance sets out clearly the recommended practical actions needed, and the standards to be achieved, to ensure compliance with duties under the 1981 Regulations. This is intended as a comprehensive guide on ensuring compliance with the law.

This article is courtesy from HSE.

Friday, 25 October 2013

Surgeon's £4 million compensation claim against hospital

A surgeon who claims he caught pneumonia while working in dirty operating theatres at Basildon Hospital is claiming up to £4million compensation. Arjuna Weerasinghe, 50, a consultant cardiothoracic surgeon, claims conditions at Basildon Hospital were so bad one of his patients died because of a lack of equipment. He also alleges medical instruments were dirty and there was a shortage of surgical masks. He told an east London employment tribunal he contracted antibiotic resistant pneumonia while working in operating theatres at the hospital’s renowned Cardiothoracic Centre, which he said hadn’t been deep cleaned for years.

Mr Weerasinghe claims he was sacked for blowing the whistle after repeatedly raising concerns about poor standards at the hospital, which is currently in special measures.

However, the hospital trust says Mr Weerasinghe was dismissed last November after bosses said he had “misled” them over his illness.

Mr Weerasinghe said: “Instruments were not always available, often had their sterility impaired and inordinate delays were routine when instruments or equipment were required during the operation.

“This initial impression soon turned to serious concern when I realised there were repeated health care failings that affected patients’ well-being.

“I believe my public interest disclosures regarding the unavailability of appropriate equipment and material in this case were a major influence in the decision to investigate and then dismiss me.”

Mr Weerasinghe said one of his patients, known only as RT, died in August 2011 because the hospital’s operating theatre was not properly stocked with equipment. During RT’s surgery the forceps being used in the patient’s chest allegedly broke. Later, when the same patient suffered a bleed, the surgeon asked for an absorption aid, only to be told there wasn’t one available.

RT later died while Mr Weerasinghe was on holiday.

The surgeon said he felt the patient would not have died if the correct equipment was on hand.

Mr Weerasinghe said since joining the trust in 2008, he had raised several concerns about standards at the centre, including instances of power cuts and theatre time being wasted.

He said there were “repeated health care failings on a regular basis” and senior nursing staff were too “frightened” to raise their worries.

The surgeon said he felt his concerns about poor care at the hospital were “ruffling the feathers” of its management.

He claims he was told formal letters expressing his concerns were not likely to be a “good way forward”.

He went off sick after contracting pneumonia in December 2011, the tribunal was told.

Mr Weerasinghe alleged the operating theatre he spent three days working in had not been regularly cleaned for more than three years.

He said he informed the hospital 11 times he felt he had picked up the infection at work because it was a drug-resistant bacteria – the type that evolves in hospitals.

Mr Weerasinghe claims trust bosses used his illness as an excuse to get rid of him because he was whistle- blowing.

He was dismissed for gross misconduct last November after the trust found he had misled them over his illness and refused to meet and discuss his condition.

Mr Weerasinghe, of Canary Wharf, East London, is now suing the trust for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and whistle blowing.

Basildon Hospital declined to comment until the hearing concludes.

The tribunal continues.

This article is courtesy from The Echo.

Thursday, 24 October 2013

Bladder involvement can lead to prostate cancer misdiagnosis

Men with lesions in the neck, trigone, or posterior wall of the bladder should be tested for basal prostate cancer as well as bladder cancer to ensure that they are not misdiagnosed, say researchers.

The team, led by Yong Xu (Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, China), found that serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements and digital rectal examination (DRE), in combination with transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and prostate needle biopsy, were valuable for accurately differentiating basal prostate cancer from bladder cancer in these cases.

The researchers reviewed all 455 patients with prostate cancer treated at their institutions between April 2003 and June 2011 and analyzed the tests they underwent. Fourteen were initially misdiagnosed as having bladder cancer.

Abdominal color ultrasounds of the urinary system revealed that these patients all had hypoechoic regions in the bladder neck and trigone, and were therefore clinically considered to have bladder-occupying lesions. This was also suggested by routine computed tomography (CT) scans carried out in nine of the patients, with evidence of intra-bladder, irregular soft tissue shadows.

However, the patients all showed signs of elevated PSA levels, ranging from 10 ng/mL to over 100 ng/mL, and DRE sleep quality, nocturia, dreams/nightmares, restless legs symptoms, and sleep-disordered breathing results revealed a hard prostate in nine patients and second- to fourth-degree prostate enlargement in 10 patients.

MRI, carried out in 11 of the 14 patients, proved more effective than CT, and showed in most cases that the bladder-protruding lesions were in fact connected to lesions in the prostate; this led to a correct diagnosis of prostate cancer in four of the patients and prostate cancer invading into the bladder in seven patients.

Prostate cancer was also confirmed with the use of prostate needle biopsy in 12 of the 14 patients and by transurethral resection of the prostate in the remaining two, with Gleason scores ranging from 7 to 9.

Xu and colleagues note that the symptomatic clinical manifestations the patients had are “similar to those of bladder neck tumor infiltrating into deep muscular layer. Therefore, this can lead into a misdiagnosis of bladder cancer instead of prostate cancer.”

They recommend that clinicians faced with such unclear cases look for prostates with disorganized structures and/or enlarged basal regions protruding into the bladder.

“A multi-view analysis can clinically reduce the rate of [prostate cancer] misdiagnosis,” the researchers conclude, adding: “[Prostate] biopsy should also be performed when prostate cancer is suspected.”

This article is courtesy from News Medical.

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

Teen with brain damage wins £2.6m compensation from Lincoln hospital

A teenage boy who suffered severe brain damage during his birth at Lincoln County Hospital has won £2.65 million in compensation.

The boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, suffered severe cerebral palsy due to being starved of oxygen while being born in the 1990s.

Lawyers believe when he was born, he was barely able to breathe due to a brief period of hypoxia during delivery.

Despite his condition, which limits his movements, the High Court in London heard that he is a bright and determined boy.

United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust (ULHT) denied liability for his delivery, stating midwives worked “diligently”, but agreed to the multi-million settlement.

ULHT will now pay the boy an upfront sum of £2.65 million, plus extra annual, index-linked and tax-free payments rising to £200,000 by the time he reaches his early 20s.

The High Court judge, Mrs Justice Swift, described the settlement as “common sense” and praised both the boy and his parents for their bravery.

This article is courtesy from The Lincolnite.

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

NHS Trust fined after radiologist exposed to radiation

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust has been fined after an interventional radiologist was exposed to significant amounts of ionizing radiation.

Boston Magistrates' Court today (7 October) heard that an interventional radiologist working with a CT scanner at Pilgrim Hospital, Boston, received more than double the annual dose limit for skin exposure in just over three months.

As an interventional radiologist his work involved the insertion of biopsy needles into patients, which he carried out using the CT scanner operating in continuous "fluoroscopy" mode, giving "real time" x-ray images which he observed whilst standing next to the scanner.

The scanner, which the trust had bought in 2009, was used by a number of other consultants for the same purpose but they used the conventional "step and shoot" method which required them to leave the room when the CT scanner was generating x-rays.

However, when the interventional radiologist arrived at the hospital in August 2011 he favoured the fluoroscopy mode, operating the x-rays for periods of up to 30 seconds at a time. Moreover, whilst inserting the biopsy needles he placed his hands directly in the main x-ray beam, resulting in an overexposure of radiation to his hands.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the Trust had never carried out a risk assessment for the CT scanner operating in the fluoroscopy mode so a safe system of work was not developed. In addition, managers were aware that this technique was being carried out but did not ensure proper procedures were followed.

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, of Greetwell Road, Lincoln, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulations 7(1) and 11 of the Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999 and was fined a total of £30,000 and ordered to pay costs of £15,128.

Speaking after the hearing HSE inspector Judith McNulty-Green said:

"The regulations require exposures to ionising radiation to be kept as low as is reasonably practicable. In addition there are dose limits which should never be exceeded. In this case the dose to the radiologist's hands was twice the relevant legal dose limit.

"As United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS trust failed to assess the risk of this machine operating in continuous mode it led to the interventional radiologist being exposed to radiation for far longer and to a much greater extent than should have been allowed."

This article is courtesy from HSE.

Monday, 21 October 2013

Sydney doctors fined for underpaying disabled employee

A western Sydney medical practice and two doctors have been fined $123,690 for discriminating against a disabled former patient that they employed as a receptionist.

The Fair Work Ombudsman has taken legal action against Medical Centre 2000 in Liverpool and its directors, alleging they underpaid the vision-impaired woman more than $20,000 between 2009 and 2012.

It says the woman was initially a patient at the practice before she was offered work there when she was aged 18-21.

The woman was made to work for a month of unpaid training before being paid a flat rate of $7 to $8 per hour.

That was despite the company receiving a disability apprentice subsidy which required her to be paid award rates of $10 - $17 per hour.

The Federal Court in Sydney has found the company and directors breached disability discrimination provisions of the Fair Work Act.

The company which operates the practice has been fined of $88,870 while its two directors, brothers Dr Ahmed Mohamed and Dr Ismail Mohamed, have been fined $17,410 each.

Fair Work Ombudsman spokesman Kevin Donnellan says it sends a strong message that workplace discrimination will not be tolerated.

"It's the biggest penalty that's been imposed in a case that involves discrimination in the workplace on an action taken by the Fair Work Ombudsman," he said.

"So it's a very strong message to all employers."

The Fair work Ombudsman says the woman's underpayment was rectified after legal proceedings began and she was awarded an extra $5000 for non-economic loss.

This article is courtesy from ABC.

Sunday, 20 October 2013

Family awarded £7.5m payout after alleged failure by doctors at children's hospital

A family whose daughter was left severely brain damaged due to the alleged failure of doctors at a Liverpool hospital has won a £7.5m payout.

Morgan Stocks was left disabled after suffering a brain haemorrhage as a baby in 2003.

Now, after an eight year battle, the family has won what their lawyers are calling one of the largest medical pay outs ever awarded in the UK.

It will go towards the cost of her life long care.

Morgan suffered an intracranial bleed when she was just five weeks old. But the family claim while doctors at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital spotted she had a cerebral aneurysm they failed to investigate and treat it, which resulted in a second more damaging bleed.

Morgan, now 10, has been left with permanent physical and mental disabilities, including brain damage, cerebral palsy and epilepsy.

Alder Hey has apologised to Morgan and her parents, Leeanne and Duane, expressing their regret and sympathy and hope that the settlement will support Morgan’s needs.

Mr Stocks said: “Morgan's brain injury has had devastating consequences both for her and our family. We have really been through the mill trying to cope and at last it feels like life is finally improving.

“It's been a long fight but we have managed to achieve a great result in court, which will really help Morgan in the future.

The case was settled following court approval, without Alder Hey accepting full liability.

Morgan received a lump sum of £2m. The rest of the money will be paid to her annually during the course of her lifetime.

Michael Danby, clinical negligence lawyer at Maxwell Hodge, said they were able to settle the claim predominantly on the basis of the expert evidence they had obtained.

He said: “As a result, Morgan will at least now be adequately compensated in relation to her lifelong needs.”

Professor Ian Lewis, medical director at Alder Hey, said: “Alder Hey was first made aware of this claim in 2008. Following an investigation at that time, the trust accepted in 2009 that the treatment Morgan received fell below the standards we adhere to at Alder Hey.

This was an extremely complicated situation. It has required thorough examination by independent experts to determine the extent of any injuries Morgan would have sustained as a result of her aneurysm, regardless of when she was admitted to hospital.”

This article is courtesy from Birmingham Mail.

Saturday, 19 October 2013

Hospital's £10million bill for medical errors

South Essex’s two biggest hospitals paid almost £10million in compensation and legal costs last year as a result of medical blunders.

NHS insurers paid a total of £5,081,234, in 2012/13 for claims on Basildon Hospital, while mistakes at Southend Hospital cost £4,197,553.

The total bill for the hospital trusts is close to the equivalent of hiring 330 nurses, earning £28,000 a year.

The figures were revealed by the NHS Litigation Authority, which handles compensation payouts on behalf of the UK’s hospitals.

ABasildon Hospital spokesman said procedures had been tightened recently, adding: “The hospital is committed to ensuring all its patients receive good-quality, safe care.

“During the past eight months, significant work has been undertaken to ensure we have improved systems for managing risks to patients.

“We hope that will be reflected in payouts by the trust in the future.”

The spokesman also said Basildon’s total was close the the national average.

It paid a total of £2.625million in damages, £1.997million in claimants’ legal costs and £457,894 to cover its own legal fees.

In Southend, the total bill was made up of £2.727million in damages, just over £1million in claimants’ legal costs and £356,000 for the hospital’s own legal costs.

Senior Southend Hospital managers insist every incident of negligence is thoroughly investigated.

Sue Hardy, the trust’s chief nurse, said: “We continuously work to reduce the risk of incidents, ensuring we learn from incidents and, where necessary, change our practice to prevent anything similar happening.

“We, naturally, regret any incidence of clinical negligence, but would like to reassure the public it is something which occurs very rarely.”

In both cases, even though the claims were settled last year, payments may relate to mistakes made any time since 1995.

Last year, 57 negligence claims were made against Basildon Hospital and 39 against the Southend trust, though many of these may not yet have been settled.

This article is courtesy from Thurrock Gazette.

Friday, 18 October 2013

Paramedic ‘went to PC World’ on way to call-out

A paramedic has admitted telling colleagues she stopped her ambulance at a retail park to pick up equipment for her computer on her way to an urgent call to help a depressed and suicidal woman.

Victoria Arnott said she was ill and needed to pick up medication, but told colleagues she had stopped her ambulance to pick up PC equipment because she was too embarrassed to tell them about her health issues.

The former Scottish Ambulance Service worker was on duty in Fife on 4 July last year when she was allocated a doctor’s urgent call to attend the woman’s home in Lochgelly and take her to Queen Margaret Hospital in Dunfermline.

Ms Arnott told the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) conduct and competence committee that she felt “pretty poorly” from the start of her 12-hour shift.

She said that while en route from Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy she decided to stop at a retail park chemist for medication.

“I was feeling symptomatic to a point where I was somewhat frustrated and distracted,” she told the three-member committee panel yesterday.

She did not ask for permission to stop because she was embarrassed and “not thinking straight”, she said.

Earlier, the panel heard the paramedic told colleagues ­investigating the seven-minute delay that she had stopped at PC World to pick up something for her computer.

Ms Arnott, who joined the ambulance service in 1999, said she was concerned about telling people about her health issues as “it is not the most discreet of services”.

The paramedic said she later felt “mortified and humiliated” about what she described as a “grave error”.

The panel heard that the call was at the second lowest level of priority with a response window of one to four hours. It had been received by the control room at 11:41am and was not allocated to Ms Arnott’s crew until 3:35pm.

Alice Stobart, counsel for Ms Arnott, said that given such a window, her client might be ­expected to know that there was unlikely to be clinical or medical input necessary.

At yesterday’s hearing, Ms ­Arnott admitted stopping on the way to the woman’s home to do personal shopping without seeking authorisation from the ambulance control centre, but denied misusing an ambulance for personal purposes.

She said she thought that a stop on medical grounds would have been allowed if she had sought permission.

The panel was told that the matter had been raised with the HCPC through an anonymous letter.

Rowena Rix, representing the body, said: “It is the HCPC’s submission that her actions did fall short of the standards expected of her.

“She did on this occasion put her own interest above that of the patient, which caused a delay in the treatment of the patient.

“While there is no suggestion of any harm caused, there was definitely potential for harm in this case.”

Ms Stobart said her client’s decision to stop was a “one-off isolated error”.

The case continues.

This article is courtesy from The Scotsman.

Thursday, 17 October 2013

Boy, two, died of meningitis after 999 operator 'lost' parent's desperate call in system leading to delay in sending ambulance

A two-year-old boy died from meningitis after his parent's desperate 999 call got 'lost in the system' and referred to NHS Direct meaning a paramedic was not sent out until it was too late to save him.

Dusan Spivak was rushed to the Royal Derby Hospital a full hour-and-a-half after his parents called the emergency services - but by then medics said it was too late to save his life.

An inquest heard how Dusan's family, originally from the Czech Republic, had dialled 999 at 10.26pm on May 29 last year after a large rash formed quickly on the youngster's belly at their home in Normanton, Derbyshire.

Michelle Summonds, acting service delivery manager for East Midlands Ambulance Service (EMAS), said that because none of the family members spoke English, it was 'difficult' for the call handler to determine how serious the incident was.

She admitted the call handler failed to source an interpreter, which meant he did not grasp how serious the situation was.

As a result, he wrongly chose to involve NHS Direct, when it was the EMAS Clinical Assessment Team - which deal with more urgent 999 calls - which needed to be sent details. He also failed to complete the referral form to NHS Direct.

The inquest at Derby Coroner's Court heard a second 999 call, which was properly handled, was made at 10.50pm and led to a paramedic arriving at the scene at 11.29pm.

Assistant deputy coroner Paul McCandles, ruled that had the first 999 call been handled correctly, a paramedic would have arrived approximately 13 minutes earlier.

Dr William Carroll, who led frantic efforts to save the youngster told the inquest the boy had developed meningococcal septicaemia - a life-threatening infection brought on by meningitis.

He said it was a condition that can bring about death very quickly and that 'every minute counts'.

Asked if Dusan would have lived had he arrived at hospital sooner, Dr Carroll replied: 'Probably, yes'.

Mr McCandles, said it was 'not possible to say' whether Dusan would have survived had the earlier call not been 'lost in the system' and the response been 13 minutes quicker.

It also emerged that a paramedic chose to go against national guidelines when it came to treating Dusan at the house.

Paul Whitfield - the first paramedic to arrive - said the boy was so ill it was clear he needed a dose of the antibiotic benzylpenicillin.

Guidelines stated the drug should not be administered if the medic is unsure about whether the patient has any allergies. Mr Whitfield said this was impossible to determine as nobody in the house spoke English.

Based on the fact the child’s condition was rapidly deteriorating, he instructed a colleague to administer the benzylpenicillin.

Mr McCandless said the paramedic was 'between the devil and the deep, blue sea' and that he should be praised for 'bravely' making the call that he did.

The inquest was also told about a 'missed opportunity' earlier in the day to uncover the serious nature of Dusan’s illness.

Dusan’s grandfather, also called Dusan Spivak, phoned Lister House Surgery Normanton, on the day the toddler fell ill.

Mr Spivak explained, via a telephone interpreting service, that Dusan had a fever, pain in his stomach and was struggling to breathe.

The receptionist, Claire Nicholas, advised him to fetch some medicine from a pharmacy to 'bring his temperature down'. Giving evidence, she admitted she should have 'concentrated more on the abdominal pain'.

However, Mr McCandless did not criticise her actions, pointing out that there had been no clear signs to suggest the Dusan was seriously ill and that she advised Mr Spivak to call back if his condition deteriorated.

In delivering his verdict, Mr McCandless said Dusan had fallen victim to a condition that was every parent’s and medic’s 'worst nightmare'.

Afterwards, a spokesperson for EMAS said it was 'sorry for the error in the categorisation of the call', and that action had been taken to prevent the incident happening again.

This article is courtesy from the Daily Mail.

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Ipswich Hospital pays £5m compensation to Joseph Rae

An Ipswich couple have agreed to a £5m compensation payout after their baby developed cerebral palsy due to delays in his hospital birth.

Joseph Rea's brain was starved of oxygen due to a 30 minute delay at Ipswich Hospital in 2006.

The hospital admitted liability and the payment was agreed at the High Court in London.

The family said the money would pay for the care he would need for the rest of his life.

Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust accepted liability for the injuries in 2009.

Joseph, now seven, has mobility problems, seizures and learning difficulties as a result of his brain injuries.

'Unreserved apology'

His parents Helen and Paul Rea argued that if he had been born half an hour earlier he would have escaped serious harm.

Tom Cook, the family's solicitor, said: "We are now pleased to have obtained sufficient compensation to ensure Joseph is cared for appropriately for the rest of his life and that his potential for development can be maximised.

"He is generally a happy and loving child, but his life will not be an easy one.

"He will always require care and therapy and will never be able to support himself financially by working."

Paul Rees QC, for the NHS Trust, issued a "full and unreserved apology to Joseph and his family" on behalf of the trust and said he hoped the settlement would give them all "peace of mind for the future".

Joseph has had care at at the East Anglia's Children's Hospices (EACH) Treehouse hospice in Ipswich, although his condition is not life-limiting.

This article is courtesy from the BBC.

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Mum who had swab left inside her sues Royal Bolton Hospital

A mother who had a swab left inside her after a procedure in the maternity unit at the Royal Bolton Hospital is one of the claimants to launch legal action against Bolton NHS Foundation Trust.

The claim is one of eight registered against the Trust in April — an increase from March when three claims were registered.

Last year 25 claims against the trust were settled by the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts, which is similar to an insurance scheme. Trusts pay a premium, which works on the level of risk.

So far this year, 21 claims have been started against the trust.

Hospital bosses encourage people to talk to the trust before launching a claim.

On possible errors, they say “medicine is not an exact science” and stressed staff work “hard to keep these to a minimum”.

In April, four claims related to delayed diagnosis or a failure to diagnose a condition properly.

Another two are linked to clinical treatment and care, one is for a birth injury and one is for a retained swab.

One in June was listed as negligent surgery and another in July as inappropriate treatment.

The retained swab was one of three cases in the maternity department between July last year and January in 2013.

This article is courtesy from The Bolton News.

Monday, 14 October 2013

Girl, 8, born with brain injury after hospital did nothing

The mother of a young girl left severely disabled by hospital failings has won a pay out of nearly £4 million.

Maryellen McDowall’s eight-year-old daughter Hollie was born with a significant brain injury due to medical errors during her birth at University Hospital Coventry.

The compensation was approved by the High Court sitting in Coventry yesterday morning.

The money will fund the care needed for the rest of Hollie’s life as, due to the trauma suffered at birth, she is unable to sit independently and is doubly incontinent.

The little girl is also unable to communicate and has limited vision.

She suffers from seizures and will never be able to walk.

Ms McDowall, who is from Coventry, brought a claim against University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (UHCW).

At the hearing, she said: ‘Although I’m relieved this process is finally over, I remain concerned that the hospital has still not learnt from its mistakes and I think the public deserve to be reassured and to be provided with evidence that steps have been taken to ensure incidents like this are not allowed to happen.’

The court was told that following an uneventful and normal pregnancy, Ms McDowall arrived at the hospital at 2pm on April 18, 2005, with contractions.

The baby’s heart rate was monitored and, although there were some initial dips in the heart rate, was reported as normal.

Contractions continued through the night but by 11am the next day Ms McDowall was becoming very anxious as she had not felt the baby move since the previous evening.

By 2.35pm, Ms McDowall was in excruciating pain and very distressed, and further drops in the heart rate were noted.

As a result, doctors were called but they did not arrive.

A ventouse delivery finally took place at 8.33pm when the baby's heart rate dropped dangerously low.

Baby Hollie was born floppy, pale and not breathing. She was resuscitated and transferred to the neonatal unit.

However, she was later diagnosed with cerebral palsy as a result of a significant brain injury, due to a lack of oxygen during the delivery.

The hospital has admitted negligence in failing to deliver Hollie sooner and admitted she would not have suffered any injury if she had been delivered.

The NHS Litigation Authority has agreed to pay a lump sum of £1.7 million plus annual payments for life to cover the costs of carers.

Meghana Pandit, Chief Medical Officer at University Hospital, said: ‘We are sincerely sorry for the indescribable distress Hollie and her family will have experienced.

‘We have taken steps to learn from what happened to Hollie and have 96 hours per week consultant presence on Labour Ward.

‘Furthermore, all women admitted to the Labour Ward with a complicated pregnancy are now reviewed by an obstetrician and a labour management plan is agreed and documented.

‘All staff now attend mandatory training sessions on electronic foetal monitoring and the use of foetal blood sampling.

‘The Trust has also implemented the use of a “Fresh Eyes” sticker, which prompts staff to double check a review of a foetal heart trace carried out by another colleague.

‘No amount of money can ever compensate for distress and suffering but I trust the family will take comfort knowing the financial settlement will go some way towards helping Hollie.’

Ms McDowall says the compensation brings much-needed financial security for her disabled youngster.

Speaking after yesterday’s High Court hearing in Coventry - in which the sum of £3,990,825 compensation was approved – she said the seven-figure pay out has brought peace of mind at last.

The 29-year-old told the Coventry Telegraph of her relief that the day had finally arrived, saying: ‘It’s good to know Hollie will always be cared for whatever happens to me or my partner in future, to know she will always have everything she needs.’

The mother-of-four admits at times it was a struggle to provide Hollie with the equipment and level of care she needed, especially with three younger children to look after - a two-and-three-quarter-year-old son, and 18-month-old twin daughters.

She said: ‘Hollie basically had what we could afford when we could afford it, but she never went without.

‘She always had everything she needed. I would rather go without myself.

‘It meant I didn’t do a lot of things that people my age would do, going out and things like that.’

The money will be looked after by the courts to ensure every penny will be spent on improving Hollie’s quality of life.

Immediate plans for the pay out include spending some of the money on a sensory room for Hollie in the family home.

The family get some help from night-time carers, but Ms McDowall says she will continue to devote the same amount of time herself to caring for her daughter, with the help of her partner Dean Frankton, aged 37.

She launched her legal fight when Hollie was six-months-old.

Speaking of her long battle for compensation, she added: ‘I’m just glad it’s all over now.

‘It’s been going on for such a long time - I never thought this day would come.’

The family’s solicitor, Ally Taft, head of clinical negligence at Alsters Kelley LLP, said: ‘Although the settlement sounds substantial, every penny will be required to look after Hollie properly and to provide her with the best care and equipment possible to try and improve her quality of life.

‘No amount of money can take back the severe injuries that Hollie suffered, although, hopefully it will make her and her family’s life more tolerable.’

This article is courtesy from the Daily Mail.

Sunday, 13 October 2013

Health care 101: Dealing with a medical error

Ms. A was a sweet older lady with a bad heart who was transferred all the way from Montana in order to get expedited workup for cardiac (heart-related) surgery.

Her story of her symptoms and disease course was the story told by hundreds of patients seen at any given hospital every year. It started with a few weeks of chest discomfort while walking, followed by a day of chest pain, nausea, vomiting and dizziness prompting an urgent 911 call.

Where she thought her symptoms were attributable to bad heartburn, the studies at her local hospital demonstrated otherwise: She was found to have severe disease in all of the major oxygen-carrying vessels that supplies her heart and was at a high risk for a fatal heart attack without surgical intervention.

While caring for Ms. A overnight, I made the incorrect decision to administer a cardiac medication to treat her disease that is known to increase the risk of bleeding during surgery. Given her need for the operation, the benefit of providing this medication to safely temporize her heart condition in the short term did not outweigh the risk of delaying the intervention that she ultimately needed. Despite the standard of care regarding this clinical scenario, I made the wrong call.

The Background

Making a medical error is the most feared consequence of practicing medicine. From misreading lab values to doing surgery on the wrong site, any slip in clinical judgment can potentially cause serious injury or even death. A landmark study conducted by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) demonstrated that medical errors in the U.S resulted around 75,000 unnecessary deaths and more than one million excess injuries each year.[1] Despite this data, it is remarkable that medical errors are made every day and usually result in little to no negative patient outcomes.

Whether one is just starting out as a physician in medical training or is a leader in their respective field, all medical providers will make mistakes during their careers. Given the fact that this is an unavoidable facet to making thousands of clinical decisions each year, how does one appropriately deal with such errors?

Unfortunately, many practitioners choose not to deal with medical mistakes at all. In a study surveying the prevalence of non-disclosed medical errors, Taylor et al. found that more than 30 percent of physicians and nurses underreported almost half of medical decisions that they perceived as clinical oversights.[2] Not only is this blaringly unethical, but also limits the medical community from creating stopgaps to avoid such errors in the future.

The Solution

There are several steps to appropriately dealing with a medical error that are relatively straightforward:

1. Let the patient and family know.

Many health care providers fear that notifying patients of an error will decrease rapport and put them at a higher risk for receiving malpractice lawsuits. Interestingly, a report by Boothman et al. from the University of Michigan demonstrates otherwise. The more that patients and their families are notified of serious mistakes, the less they are inclined to reactively sue.

Regardless of the tangible consequence of making a medical error, practitioners have the ethical duty to let their patients know of any significant clinical oversights.

2. Notify the rest of the care team.

Alerting the rest of a patient's care team of a medical error is not easy. It essentially demonstrates one's fallibility to his or her colleagues and may result in considerable changes to the predetermined patient-care plan. Despite this, these errors must be relayed to the rest of the care team in order to better handle any immediate significant negative patient outcomes and reduce further mismanagement from occurring.

3. Document the error and report it to the hospital-safety committee.

In order to avoid further complications to a patient's care, it is essential that the medical error be appropriately documented and reported. By doing so, it avoids further complications by independent health care providers who also assume care of the patient and can globally increase patient well-being by improving hospital-wide safety measures.

The Take-Home Point
Committing and dealing with a medical error is one of the more humbling experiences in the field of medicine.

Given the fact that making clinical errors in judgment is an inevitable aspect to clinical practice, it is imperative that practitioners of all levels of training be aware and comfortable in appropriately handling such events.

* The patient's demographic information in this article was changed to protect identity and assure anonymity.

References:

1. Kohn L T, Corrigan J M, Donaldson MS (Institute of Medicine) To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.

2. Taylor JA, Brownstein D, Christakis DA, et al. Use of incident reports by physicians and nurses to document medical errors in pediatric patients. Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):729-35.

3. Boothman RC, Blackwell AC, Campbell DA, et al. A better approach to medical malpractice claims? The University of Michigan experience. J Health Life Sci Law. 2009 Jan;2(2):125-59.

This article is courtesy from the Huffington Post.

Saturday, 12 October 2013

Disabled boy wins massive NHS compensation payout

A little boy left in a wheelchair after suffering a brain haemorrhage in his mother's womb at a Dorset Hospital has been guaranteed a massive NHS compensation payout.
Joshua Hurd, who cannot stand or walk, has grave learning difficulties and suffers from seizures due to the injuries he suffered prior to his birth by caesarean section in May 2002, is set to receive a compensation package running to millions of pounds to fund the lifetime of care and assistance he will need.

The 11-year-old's mother Georgina, from Ringwood, sued managers at Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester, and claimed that negligence by the hospital's staff led to his delivery being catastrophically delayed.

The Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust admitted that Joshua ought to have been delivered some four hours earlier than he was, London's High Court was told, but disputed that the delay made any difference to the tragic outcome.

However, before Mr Justice Dingemans at London's High Court, the two sides reached a settlement whereby the Trust agreed to pay damages on the basis of 50 per cent of a full valuation of the family's claim.

Given the severity of Joshua's disabilities and the enormous projected costs of his future care, the deal guarantees him a very substantial damages award, which will almost certainly run into millions of pounds, even after a 50 per cent deduction.

David Westcott QC, who represented Joshua and his family, told the judge that the family had decided to settle because of the risks that they might lose the case and be left with nothing.

He said: “This is sensible settlement of a jolly difficult case.

“Joshua has sought to hold the Trust responsible for his injuries.

“The Trust admitted that Joshua should have been delivered some four hours before he was, but denied liability on causation grounds.”

Mr Justice Dingemans approved the terms of the compromise, saying: “I can see good sense on both sides in coming to this settlement. I'm very happy to approve it.”

The exact sum of compensation due to the boy will be assessed by a judge at a later date, unless a final agreement is reached before then.

A spokesperson for the Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust said: “We are unable to comment on the specifics of this individual case due to confidentiality and the fact that the case is not yet concluded.

“These cases do not occur very often and are sad for everyone involved.

“We would like to reassure everyone that has their babies with us here at Dorset County Hospital that most births are straightforward and a happy event for families.”

This article is courtesy from the Bournemouth Echo.

Friday, 11 October 2013

Type 2 diabetes misdiagnosis results in the death of a six-year-old girl

The little girl could barely breathe. She lay on the hospital bed, her chest rising with each forced inhalation. Irma Nicanor held her only child's hand. The six-year-old's eyes were closed, but Irma felt her tiny fingers squeezing.

"Stay strong, Claudialee," she told her in Spanish.

Irma was dazed by how everything had gone so bad so quickly. It was early on a January evening in 2010. They'd checked into New York Hospital in Flushing that afternoon. Claudialee was nauseated and had a tummy ache. Irma figured she'd caught a stomach virus from a boy in their apartment building. She now knew that it was more than that.

Two days before, Cladialee was running around the house, climbing over couches and crawling under tables. She seemed as healthy as she'd ever been. Yes, she was overweight, and her blood sugar was slightly high, but Irma was seeing to it that her daughter would get fit.

A bubbly girl with a loud laugh, full cheeks, and a thick mop of dark brown hair, Claudialee had plenty of energy for that mission. The girl took ballet and karate lessons. She ran around the park with her dad and rode bikes with her cousin. During snack time at P.S. 32, she pulled out sandwich bags filled with celery and carrots and sliced fruit. Her first-grade teacher would eat with Claudialee so that she wouldn't feel bad about not having sweets like the other kids.

Irma was always conscious about her daughter's health. Over the past three months alone, she'd taken Claudialee to six medical appointments: three times to her pediatrician, Dr. Thelma Cabatic, for flu shots and checkups; and three times to her endocrinologist, Dr. Arlene Mercado, to deal with her blood sugar. At each visit, Mercado would tell Irma that her girl was fine, in need of nothing more than diet and exercise.

Yet two weeks after her last checkup, here was Claudialee struggling for air, half-conscious in an emergency room. "Patient has slight movement of all four extremities spontaneously but not on command," the hospital notes read. "Mumbles occasionally."

The scene was overwhelming for a mother. Nurses scurrying around. Chemicals with smells much stronger than the cleaning supplies Irma used in her job as a housekeeper. Intravenous tubes attached to Claudialee's arms, alternately streaming potassium salts, water, and glucose. The girl's blood sugar had risen to 525 milligrams per deciliter—more than five times the normal level.

How could this happen? Irma kept asking herself.

Claudialee's lungs struggled as the night wore on. Nurses strapped an oxygen mask to her face. It wasn't enough. They decided to push a tube down the child's throat so a ventilator could help her breathe. But Claudialee wasn't having it. Even half-conscious, she was still a flare of vigor. Her arms flailed and her legs kicked. The nurses didn't expect such strength. They retreated and injected her with a sedative. Then they inserted the tube. Claudialee was now unconscious and dependent on a machine to supply her with oxygen.

Irma sat in the waiting room, praying. She called her sister Marta. It was about 4 a.m., but Marta rushed to the hospital. She got lost in the hallways, missed the waiting room, and ended up at Claudialee's bedside. The two were alone, the only sounds coming from the robotic hums and beeps of intensive care.

"It hurts," Marta thought she heard the girl whisper.

"Where does it hurt?"

There came no reply.

St. James Avenue was quiet and still on October 31, 2009. Irma and Claudialee passed the modest wood-frame homes with yards fronted by low chain-link or wrought-iron fences. American flags fluttered beside satellite dishes. Not a single person was in sight. Just the kind of tranquility a family hopes for when they move to Elmhurst.

Mother and daughter stopped in front of a cream-colored three-story house, then walked up the driveway to a concrete backyard. Irma might as well have been taking Claudialee to a classmate's birthday party.

Court documents, medical records, and interviews would detail what followed.

The pair descended a stairwell to a minimalist setup: a desk and several chairs. Curtains forming two makeshift rooms. Dr. Arlene Mercado's office was in the basement of her sister Myra Mercado Capistrano's house.

Mercado opened the clinic in 2007. Thirteen different insurance companies listed her practice in their network. She had a second practice at the SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn. And she accepted Medicaid, the government health program for low-income people. She was a pediatric endocrinologist, specializing in children and the hormones and chemicals that could stunt growth or bring on early puberty. The most common issue she dealt with was diabetes.

She was well versed in practice, if not theory. Mercado was not board-certified in her specialty, American Board of Pediatrics records show. She failed the certification exam more than five times. Without passing that, she couldn't attempt the next step, the pediatric endocrinology test. But these setbacks didn't stop her. Board certification isn't mandatory. In fact, though she couldn't pass the test herself, Mercado taught a certification-exam review course in Children's Hospital at SUNY Downstate.

Her business was a family affair. Mercado had two paid employees: Myra, the clinic manager, and Myra's husband, Edward Capistrano, the billing supervisor. The Capistranos' children handled the patients.

Paul, a 23-year-old political science grad student with a degree in math, and Bernard, a 21-year-old graphic design major, measured heights, weights, and blood pressure. Twelve-year-old William sat at the front desk, answering phones and filling out appointment cards.

Irma handed William a referral card from Claudialee's pediatrician, Dr. Cabatic.

She'd taken Claudialee to see Cabatic five days earlier for the first in a series of flu vaccinations. Claudialee had the sniffles, so Cabatic ran her through a full examination. Four days later, the doctor called to say that Claudialee's urine and red blood cells showed abnormal glucose levels. Her blood sugar was above normal, suggesting the girl might become diabetic. In her notes, Cabatic wrote, "probable diabetes mellitus."

The disease stems directly from high blood sugar. In type 1 diabetes, the immune system kills off cells that produce insulin, the hormone that brings the body's glucose supply to muscle and fat. If the body doesn't get more insulin, the person will die.

In type 2, a person has a lot of insulin, but the stuff just doesn't work. Insulin resistance, doctors call it. Obesity is the usual cause. The damage is slower and can be treated through diet, exercise, and medication.

Cabatic knew Claudialee was at high risk for diabetes. The girl's maternal grandmother, paternal grandfather, and three of her uncles had it. She recommended that the girl see a specialist and gave Irma the name of a pediatric endocrinologist who spoke Spanish and would accept her Metroplus Medicaid card. (Metroplus, a nonprofit healthcare organization that provides Medicaid in New York, did not respond to interview requests for this story.)

Irma called Mercado's office to set up an appointment for the next morning.

After asking about the family history, Mercado took a blood sample from Claudialee. The doctor was a short, round woman who peered over thin spectacles and disarmed with a cheerful smile. She told Irma she would send the blood to a lab and they'd discuss the results in two weeks.

The test would duplicate Cabatic's results: Claudialee's blood sugar level was higher than normal, but not high enough to be considered diabetes. She was "prediabetic." During the next visit, Mercado explained to Irma that the results were nothing to be too concerned about. The girl just needed to lose weight. Diet and exercise. She handed Irma a sheet of paper with a food pyramid on it.

In her notes, Mercado wrote that if the patient didn't lose weight by her next checkup in mid-December, she would prescribe Metformin, a drug used to treat type 2 diabetes.

Though type 2 used to be called "adult-onset" diabetes, Mercado knew recent studies had shown that a growing number of kids were getting it. At 3-foot-9 and 67 pounds, Claudialee was clinically obese. Mercado noticed a dark spot on her neck, often a sign of insulin resistance.

By her next appointment on December 12, things were looking up. Claudialee was thinner. Mercado didn't conduct any tests or ask many questions. It was a brief but reassuring meeting, full of grins and calming words. Claudialee is fine, the doctor told Irma. She just needs to drop another pound or two. Diet and exercise.

In her notes, Mercado wrote that she'd administer another blood glucose test on the next visit. As Irma left, William handed her an appointment card telling them to come back on February 23.

Cabatic echoed Mercado's optimism when the mother and daughter returned on January 9 for the girl's final flu shot. It happened that Claudialee had come home early from school the day before. During snack time, she complained that her heart was beating faster than normal. The nurse sent Irma a note saying a doctor had to sign off before Claudialee could return to class. Cabatic assessed her vital signs. Normal heart rate and blood pressure. No cough. No chest pain. No difficulty breathing. All was stable.

Cabatic had more good news: In the 10 weeks since the October 26 checkup, Claudialee had lost five pounds and grown two inches.

As far as the doctors could tell, Claudialee was getting healthier by the week.

On January 21, Marta Nicanor, Irma's sister, picked up her six-year-old son, Gustavo, and Claudialee from school. Irma worked as a housekeeper for a family in Port Washington, Long Island. Most days she left her apartment at 8:30 a.m. and didn't get home until nearly 8 p.m, so Claudialee spent most of her evenings at her aunt's place. She'd play with Gustavo, her best friend.

Claudialee told Marta she was tired and that her stomach had been bothering her. She wanted to lie down. Marta called Irma, who called Dr. Cabatic to schedule an appointment for first thing the following morning. She left work early and arrived at her sister's apartment about 4:30 p.m.

When Claudialee heard her mother come in, she hopped out of bed, ran over to her, and threw up. Irma took her to their apartment, one floor up in the same building.

Born less than 15 months apart, Irma and Marta were closer to one another than to any of their other six siblings. The family grew up poor in the state of Puebla, southeast of Mexico City, and they both dreamed of raising their children in the United States. When they were in their early 20s, they made their way north. Over the years, they would earn the solid, working-class life they'd aspired to.

For a while Irma lived in East Harlem with Claudialee's father, Napolean Gomez. They separated when Claudialee was a year old. Irma moved in with Marta and her husband in Flushing. She stayed for a year, waiting for an apartment to open up in the same building. She wanted to live near her sister, who stayed home to look after her three children. There was nobody Irma trusted more with the care of her daughter.

Irma took Claudialee's temperature. No fever. She offered food but the girl wasn't hungry. She was very thirsty, though. Irma placed Gatorade and ginger ale on the nightstand by her bed, but Claudialee only wanted water. She napped for a couple of hours, then gulped more water. She fell back to sleep at about 10 p.m., with her mother lying beside her.

Claudialee woke up drowsy. She always dressed herself, but on this day Irma had to do it for her.

They made the 10-minute walk and got to Dr. Cabatic's clinic at 9:30 a.m. It didn't open until 10, but Irma routinely arrived at doctors' appointments early. Then 9:30 became 10:30 and 10:30 became 11. The door remained locked. Irma called Cabatic's cell phone and office line seven times. No answer.

Claudialee kept saying her stomach ached, that she felt tired and really thirsty. She'd vomited three more times that morning.

She normally didn't complain about things—she was the type of girl who fell off a scooter, scraped her knee, and got right back on without hesitation. Irma called a cab and asked the driver to take them to New York Hospital.

Claudialee began to sway and stumble as they walked toward the emergency room. Before reaching the entrance, she nearly collapsed. Irma picked her up and carried her the rest of the way.

As hospital workers ran tests, a nurse asked Irma if Claudialee had been urinating more and drinking more than usual recently. Irma said she had noticed her daughter doing both since Christmas.

This suggested that Claudialee's blood sugar had been rising.

The test results—five times the normal level—supported that hypothesis.

"When the doctors came in and told me about blood-sugar levels—that was a surprise," Irma tells the Voice. "That was the last thing I expected to hear. That's when I knew something was really wrong."

There had been other signs. Months after Claudialee checked into New York Hospital's ER, pediatric endocrinologist Craig Alter reviewed her medical records. He was shocked, unable to understand why Dr. Mercado had so quickly ruled out type 1 diabetes.

"If you tell me there is a five-year-old with diabetes, the chance that they have type 1 is probably 99.99 percent," he would later testify. "If you tell me they are obese, I would say, okay, the chance is 99.7. It's almost definitely type 1."

Alter, a physician at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, is one of the world's top experts on diabetes in kids. He teaches a pediatric endocrinology class at the University of Pennsylvania's medical school. He is chairman of the Educational Committee for the Endocrine Society and gives lectures across the globe. In 2001, he founded Camp Freedom, a summer program in Pennsylvania that brings together diabetic youth for a week of swimming, hiking, and sharing insulin-injection stories around the bonfire. Last year, 140 kids registered; 139 of them had type 1.

Even though rates of type 2 are rising among minors, the condition remains rare in children under 10 years old. The National Institutes of Health report that one out of every 5,000 kids in that age group has type 1 diabetes, while one out of every 250,000 gets type 2. The reason is simple: Type 1 is a condition people are born with or acquire very early in life; type 2 develops over time—enough time for the body to build a resistance to insulin.

Not only is type 1 far more common in six-year-olds, it is also far more urgent.

"Type 2, you have a little more luxury of time. Type 1, you do not have the luxury of time," Alter testified. "Type 1, if we don't give them insulin, they will die."

Blood sugar is like temperature—it rises gradually. In the months since Claudialee's last tests, the girl's blood sugar level continued to rise, right under her doctors' noses.

Even as the puzzle pieces began to emerge, each showing a symptom of the disease, neither Mercado nor Cabatic saw the whole picture. Weight loss can indicate that the body is starving as a result of its failure to absorb glucose. Sudden heart palpitations can indicate that the body is dehydrated from losing the sugar-laden fluids via urination.

"In a child where there is a possibility of diabetes, any symptoms that develop that might be linked to diabetes have to be assumed diabetes until proven otherwise," Alter said. "You look for anything to tip you over the edge. The appropriate treatment would have been more-frequent monitoring to determine if diabetes was present then, or to catch it early within a few days, had it progressed."

Because Mercado had locked in on type 2, she did not monitor her patient's blood. She did not tell Irma to purchase a $20 blood sugar meter from the drugstore. She did not ask Irma about the frequency with which her daughter drank and urinated. And neither she nor Cabatic described to Irma the danger signs to look out for.
"Being that she has a family history of diabetes, I would be thinking that she would know the symptoms of diabetes," Cabatic later testified in court.

Even after it was clear that Claudialee suffered from type 1, Mercado stood by her diagnosis. When later questioned in court, she disagreed with the notion that type 2 diabetes is uncommon in young kids.

"How many type 2 infant diabetics have you treated?" a lawyer asked her.

"A lot," she replied. "Maybe it's geographical, because I work at Brooklyn as an assistant professor and also in wellness program where there are a lot of obese children, so we diagnose a lot of children with type 2 diabetes."

It's tempting to assume that Claudialee received substandard care because of her family's income status. Doctors don't make as much money treating Medicaid beneficiaries, explains Jim Sheehan, former New York State Medicaid inspector general. A specialist earns as little as $30 a visit. By contrast, a pediatric endocrinologist treating someone with private insurance gets nearly $100 an hour. So Medicaid providers often have trouble filling their networks with enough doctors who specialize in common issues like diabetes. Patients are sometimes left to the lesser skilled or lesser known—doctors who can't afford to turn away the business.

"Some specialties, they have a very tough time recruiting people to be Medicaid-based," says Sheehan. "And so you're not gonna say, 'We want board-certified.'"

Though she'd failed to earn certification, Arlene Mercado had established a respectable career. She graduated from the University of Santo Tomas's medical school in the Philippines in 1984 and spent much of the next decade treating poor people in rural villages. She came to the U.S. in the mid-1990s, interning at Harlem Hospital before beginning her residency at Pitt County Memorial Hospital in Greenville, North Carolina. Her transition reflected competence: Foreign doctors must complete a rigorous testing process to become licensed here.

After two years of endocrinology training at the National Institutes of Health, Mercado took a position as a senior fellow at Mt. Sinai Hospital in Manhattan. In 2006, SUNY Downstate hired her as an attending physician. Two years later, she was named associate medical director of the hospital's wellness program for obese and diabetic patients. (SUNY did not respond to interview requests for this story.)

By the time Mercado treated Claudialee, a good number of experienced doctors had vouched for her. She'd co-authored at least seven academic papers in peer-reviewed journals. Multiple private insurance companies added her to their networks. Over the course of her career in New York, she sustained a spotless record. Not once had the Office of Professional Medical Conduct, an investigatory division of the New York State Department of Health, taken disciplinary action against her.

Shortly after sunset on January 23, 2010, Irma and Napolean sat in the waiting room at New York Presbyterian Cornell Medical Center. Claudialee had been transferred there a few hours before. Family and friends surrounded the parents.

A doctor approached and explained what was happening to their daughter. Claudialee's blood sugar had been rising for months. Because she didn't have enough insulin, her body burned fatty acids as an alternative fuel source. As those acids accumulated, they poisoned her body, and its systems began to shut down. The resulting nerve damage allowed fluids to seep into her brain, causing it to swell and pushing her further from consciousness. Twice that evening, doctors had had to resuscitate Claudialee. Now only machines kept her alive.

There was almost no chance she would recover.

That reality was dawning on Irma. She'd tried to stay optimistic, to stay strong for her only child. She'd dedicated herself to building a life for her daughter. She thought she'd done everything right. Coming to America. Working the long hours that might pull them up the economic ladder. Signing the girl up for dance classes and after-school tutoring sessions. And all those doctor visits. She wondered what she should have done better.

She felt guilty and betrayed. She'd put her faith in the healthcare process and it failed her.

Irma asked about organ donation. The doctor told her that wouldn't be possible. Her daughter's organs were damaged beyond repair.

The family members entered Claudialee's room and said their goodbyes.

On a summer afternoon, the waiting room of Downstate Pediatrics Associates is filled with nearly two dozen people. There are babies in strollers, parents reading magazines, and grade-schoolers playing tag. There are giggles and stomps and adults saying things like "give that man his sunglasses back" and "take that sticker off your face."

A reporter approaches the front desk and asks to speak with Dr. Arlene Mercado. The receptionist goes to get her.

It has been a rough few weeks for Mercado. In July, a jury found her 100 percent liable for the death of Claudialee Gomez-Nicanor. (Cabatic, also a defendant, was cleared.) In her testimony, Mercado admitted to having thrown away her original notes from Claudialee's treatments after learning she had been subpoenaed. Before discarding them, she typed up copies for the court. The new version indicated that she had intended to administer a blood test at Claudialee's next appointment in January 2010, days before the girl's death.

But Irma had been meticulous with her daughter's medical documents. She'd kept the appointment card for their next visit, which wasn't until February 23.

Jurors awarded Irma $100,000 for economic loss, $400,000 for her daughter's pain and suffering, plus $7.5 million in punitive damages for Mercado's malpractice. "It's not covered by insurance," Judge Darrell Gavrin pointed out at trial. Gavrin has yet to make a final judgment on the total sum Mercado must pay.

It's unlikely that Mercado has to worry about a state sanction. Historically, the Department of Health has doled out punishment only once it recognizes a pattern of misbehavior or incompetence. (The department did not respond to interview requests.)

"There are many physicians who have been sued and lost a malpractice case and are still practicing," says a New York government official who works closely with the medical industry and was not authorized to publicly discuss the subject. "The Office of Professional Medical Conduct will take a look at trends, as opposed to an isolated incident."

Staten Island cosmetic surgeon Robert Cattani, for instance, tallied 40 malpractice suits before the state revoked his medical license in September 2012. Another plastic surgeon in Brooklyn didn't lose his license until regulators found negligence on seven occasions.

Between 2001 and 2011, according to a USA Today investigation, of about 400 doctors who had their clinical privileges reduced or revoked by a medical institution in New York, more than half had never been assessed a single state penalty.

Mercado still runs a private practice. She still serves on the SUNY faculty. So it's understandable that she's reluctant to discuss the case. She stands at the door that separates the waiting area from the treatment rooms, holding it halfway closed like a reluctant homeowner talking to a salesman.

"I did my best for this patient," Mercado says. "I know in my heart that I did everything for this patient."

She declines to go into specifics or answer any questions.

"I'll just stay silent on this, because God knows best," she says, pointing to the ceiling with both index fingers.

Then she closes the door. Her afternoon schedule is full. There's a roomful of patients awaiting treatment.

This article is courtesy from Village Voice.

Thursday, 10 October 2013

Doubling of NHS 'never events' never happened

Three papers report that 'never events' - the most serious of patient safety incidents - have doubled on the NHS in the past year. But they haven't - they've fallen.

Sometimes, and often with tragic consequences, NHS patient care goes badly wrong. These 'never events' are what the Department of Health (DH) terms "serious, largely preventable patient safety incidents that should not occur if the available preventative measures have been implemented by healthcare providers."

According to at least four papers last week, 299 such incidents occurred in the 2012/13 financial year. This sparked a consistent array of headlines:
(Express) - NHS blunders double

(Telegraph) - 
Potentially fatal 'never' errors double in year on NHS

(Mail) - 
Extreme 'never event' NHS blunders ... double in a year

Except this isn't the case. NHS 'never events' have not doubled. In fact, they've fallen. Full Fact got in touch with NHS England who, after some delay, clarified that the figures used by the papers were actually taking figures from two different - and non-comparable - datasets:

"The correct comparison is between data taken from the NHS serious incident management system (STEIS), which shows that the number of never events reported in the NHS was 326 in 2011/12 and around 299 in 2012/13 (note this latter figure is subject to alteration following further verification)."

So the available data (that isn't yet fully verified) actually suggests the number of never events is falling, not doubling.

What went wrong?

It all comes down to measurement. The concept of a 'never event' has been around since 2009 but started out with just eight different 'categories'. Since 2012, the list has been expanded to cover 25 types of incident, everything from surgery in the wrong place and 'foreign objects' left in the body after an operation to badly scalding patients and allowing transferred prisoners to escape.

But, surprisingly, these aren't all recorded in one place. Formerly a never event was reported to a Strategic Health Authority (SHA) when these still existed, but some were also reported to a database called the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS), which centrally collates patient safety incident reports. As the DH points out:

"This is a separate reporting system and the majority of these reports correspond to incidents also reported to the SHAs, so the totals cannot be added together."

In fact, the figures can differ a lot. Last year (in 2011/12) SHAs recorded 326 never events, but the NRLS only recorded 163. That 163 figure was used in the comparison with this year's 299 figure - hence the claims that incidents have 'doubled'.

Now that NHS England has confirmed the 299 figure is from the 2012/13 SHAs data, it's the 326 figure we should be using in comparison with this year.

This is all still very confusing of course. The good news is that the NHS itself is aware of this, and is developing a single system of incident reporting. From next month, NHS England will be publishing records of never events on a quarterly basis.

Waiting on corrections

While it might not be the press' fault that the earlier numbers were confused, the record still needs to be corrected. NHS England confirmed that a letter of clarification has been sent to the papers involved. We'll be keeping watch to make sure the matter is set straight.

This article is courtesy from Full Fat.

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Receiving Compensation for NHS Negligence through Legal Action

NHS physicians are rarely negligent and unprofessional, but there are some instances when medical errors or misdiagnosis have resulted in dramatic bodily harm suffered by patients combined with significant emotional distress or lost financial income due to missed days at work.

If you have suffered from medical negligence or omissions made by NHS medical professionals, then you have the right to obtain a financial compensation for the experienced distress and health problems through a partnership with one of the most experienced solicitors in the UK. The compensation may include the resulted physical pain, additional medical costs to correct the health damage, expenses for cosmetic surgery to repair damages, lost wages and even emotional trauma as a result of the unfortunate medical event. Contact one of the best UK solicitors with in-depth knowledge and a solid experience in the malpractice legal field, who will evaluate your case and determine if there is a potential to restore justice and secure a monetary compensation if your personal injury case goes to court.

According to the statistic data, between 1997 and 2010, NHS negligence and medical mistakes have resulted in about 8,000 deaths. Even if the person does not die after an unfortunate medical negligence event or misdiagnosis, they may experience a dramatically decreased quality of life, chronic physical pain, disability, a loss of work productivity, family or relationship difficulties, social impairment and emotional pain. These consequences of personal injury caused by NHS doctors are carefully evaluated by UK solicitors whose mission is to help the victims of medical errors obtain a financial compensation for their suffering and monetary losses.

How does one proceed if they believe that they have been the victims of medical negligence, surgical error or misdiagnosis? The most important step is to secure a knowledgeable ally by contacting one of the most experienced solicitors in the UK who can evaluate the eligibility for a negligence compensation and elaborate a plan for legal action against the NHS. It is important to provide all available evidence, in the form of medical documents, employment papers, evidence of disability and lost income as a result of missed time at work.

Highly experienced lawyers are ready to evaluate each case individually and estimate the chances for a successful outcome in court, which should result in a substantial compensation secured through a fruitful partnership with one of the professional UK solicitors with sufficient experienced in the medical malpractice field. Suffering in silence is certainly a bad plan when effective legal action can relieve some of the pain through a fair compensation.

Monday, 7 October 2013

Extreme 'never event' NHS blunders such as operating on the wrong body part or giving lethal doses of painkillers double in a year

The number of hospital mistakes deemed so serious they should never have happened has almost doubled in a single year.
There were 299 ‘never’ events in 2012/13, up from 163 in 2011/12, according to the Department of Health’s own figures.
Among 25 types of  incidents are surgical instruments left in the body, operations on the wrong body part and fatal errors such as feeding tubes inserted into the lungs and patients given lethal doses of painkillers.

A list of these errors, by hospital, will be published so patients can see where the highest number occur.

NHS England – the organisation in charge of the health service – will release the data four times a year starting from next month.

There are 25 different types of ‘never events’ including surgery on the wrong body part, patients being given lethal doses of painkillers and mothers dying during caesareans.

Others include feeding tubes inserted into the lungs rather than the stomach and staff muddling up patients giving them the wrong treatment or operation.
But medical negligence lawyers believe that thousands of these mistakes occur each year but staff often try and cover them up in case patients try to sue.

NHS England could not explain why the numbers had increased so starkly and said another organisation had been responsible for collecting them in the past.

Mike Durkin, the body’s director of patient safety said: ‘NHS England intends to begin publishing more detailed data on never events on a more regular basis very soon, providing more frequent information on the numbers and kinds of never events that occur in the NHS as part of its wider commitment to transparency but also to stimulate more learning and preventative action in the NHS.
‘Every single never event is one too many and, as Don Berwick (the Government’s tsar on preventing harm) made clear in his recent report, we need to openly and publicly report and address safety problems, not so that people can lay blame inappropriately, but so that we can fully understand and therefore learn more from the safety problems that the NHS, like all healthcare systems, faces.’
One grieving relative described how nurses had mistakenly inserted a feeding tube into her mother’s lungs instead of her stomach.
Speaking anonymously, the victim said staff had also failed to carry out an x-ray to check it was in the right place.

In a recent interview with the BBC she said: ‘You feel guilty because when she [was] talking to us she kept saying she wanted to come out, and we kept saying, ‘You can’t come out, mum, until you get better,’

‘You feel angry after, because you think someone’s killed your mum. No, they probably didn’t do it on purpose but that’s how it feels. You feel that somebody’s killed her.’
Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said: ‘These worrying figures reveal an NHS cutting too many corners and sailing dangerously close to the wind.
‘Ministers have been repeatedly warned that too many hospitals in England do not have enough staff to provide care. Their failure to act has left wards under-staffed and nurses over-stretched. That explains why so many nurses say they have considered resigning.
‘The warning signs of an NHS under intense pressure are growing day by day and David Cameron cannot continue to ignore them. He must act to halt the job losses and ensure all hospitals in England have enough staff on the wards to provide safe care.’

This article is courtesy from the Daily Mail.